User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3.1; TF300T Build/JLS36I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 35.0.1916.117Android 4.3.1Blink AsusTransformer Pad TF300Ttablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeAndroid 4.3.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.27503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3AsusTransformer Pad TF300Ttabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeAndroid 4.3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.3.1AsusTF300Tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.3.1AsusTransformer Pad 300tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:27 | by ThaDafinser