User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0); 360Spider(compatible; HaosouSpider; http://www.haosou.com/help/help_3_2.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-702.php
yes360SpiderBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yes360SpiderBot/Crawler0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes360SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyes360Spiderclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
360Spider Trident 5.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyes360spiderclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:26 | by ThaDafinser