User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (FreeBSD; U; Viera; xx) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/3.10.0 Chrome/23.0.1271.97 Safari/537.11; Freetime/1.0 (freetime); (Panasonic, 2014, idtv, low, wired); (sLD8A, 15430);
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Viera Browser 3.10.0 Webkit 537.11PanasonicViera 2014television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SmartViera 3.1WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicViera TVTV Device0.107 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 23.0WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSmart TVtv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97WebKit 537.11FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Viera Browser 3.10.0Webkit 537.11 PanasonicViera 2014televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:26 | by ThaDafinser