User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 6.12) Vodafone/1.0/HTC_VPACompactIV/4.14.162.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCVPACompactIV Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 6.12Trident 3.1WinCE VodafoneHerald/Wing/AtlasMobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 6.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 6.12closeWindows VodafoneVPA Compact IVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 6.12Trident Windows CE HTCVPACompactIVsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 6.12closeWindows CE HTCVPACompactIVcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 6.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.0VodafoneVPA Compact IVmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile VodafoneVPA Compact IVFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:26 | by ThaDafinser