User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; WPDesktop; NOKIA; Lumia 625) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
IEMobile 11.0WinPhone8.1 8.17.0 NokiaLumia 625Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1NokiaLumia 625Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 11.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows RT NokiaLumia 625smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows RT Nokia625closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.2NokiaLumia 625closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 625mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:26 | by ThaDafinser