User agent detail

KWC-K483J/1007 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KyoceraK483J Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KWC-K483J 1007closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2.c.1.101close KyoceraK483JLCmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 KyoceraK483Jsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close KyoceraK483Jcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2.c.1.101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 KyoceraK483Jmobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KyoceraK483JLCFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:26 | by ThaDafinser