User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 ;Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0; like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Windows 7Trident 7.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 11.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Trident 7.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:25 | by ThaDafinser