User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; pt-br; XT321 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Versão/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Android Browser Android 2.3.6WebKit MotorolaDefy Minismartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.3.6MotorolaXT321mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3MotorolaDefy Minismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6MotorolaXT321closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6MotorolaDEFY Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3MotorolaXT321Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:25 | by ThaDafinser