User agent detail

HTC_Touch_3G_T3232 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.6.1.82
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch_3G_T3232 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.6WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.6 Windows CE HTCTouch 3G T3232smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.6.1closeWindows CE HTCTouch_3G_T3232closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.6.1.82 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.6Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTouch 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch 3G T3232Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:25 | by ThaDafinser