User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/6.5.27035/35.7770; U; ru) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 6.5JAVA unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.5.27035closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.5.27035close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.5.27035close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.5.27035close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.5.27035Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.5Presto 2.8.119 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.5close OperaMini 6Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser