User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PowerPC MorphOS 3.5; Odyssey Web Browser; rv:1.24) AppleWebKit/538.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.24 Safari/538.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-morphos.yaml
Odyssey 1.24MorphOS 3.5Webkit 538.10desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.10closeMorphOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Odyssey Web Browser 1.24WebKit MorphOS 3.5desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 538.10Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Odyssey 1.24Webkit 538.10MorphOS 3.5desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser