User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini3.1 (ZTE-R516-BREW-B01)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
QQ Browser Mini 3.1Brew ZTER516mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini3.1close SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ZTER516smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 3.1close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser ZTE R516closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 3.1 Brew ZTER516mobile:featureyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonST25iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.081 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser