User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; zh-cn; MyPhone_A818_Slim_Duo Build/GRK39F; 320*480) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MyPhoneA818_Slim_Duo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.3.6MyPhoneA818_Slim_Duocloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94WebKit 528.5Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.6MyPhoneA818 Slim Duomobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser