User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.1; en-US; iBall_Slide_i7011 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
iBallSlide_i7011 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.1GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3iBallSlide i7011tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.1iBallSlide_i7011closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315WebKit 528.5Android 2.3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.1iBallSlide i7011tabletyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser