User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-M8910H/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Mozilla/5.0 (rv:1.3) NetFront/3.5 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-M8910H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-M8910H 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront SamsungGT-M8910Hsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-M8910Hcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungGT-M8910Hmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser