User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.0.3/27.2339; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 320X240 LG VN530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Opera Mini 6.0.3Brew Presto 2.8.119LGOctanemobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3close KyoceraE4520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.0Presto Brew LGVN530smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.0.3close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.0.3closeBREW LGVN530closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3Presto 2.8.119 LGLG VN530closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.0.3Presto 2.8.119Brew LGOctanemobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.0close KyoceraE4520Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser