User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.2.1) (mimic Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8) Classilla/CFM
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Firefox 3.6.8Mac OS Classic 9.2.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.8closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.8close closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Classilla 9.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.8Gecko 20100722Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.8Gecko 9.2.1MacOS desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:24 | by ThaDafinser