User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.1; zh-cn; MZ-M571C Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/40.0.2214.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/phablet.yml
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214.114Android 5.1Blink MeizuM2 Notephablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.063 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.31003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 40.0Blink Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notephabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.1MZ-M571Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.114WebKit 537.36Android 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 5.1MZ-M571Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.084 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 40closeAndroid 5.1MeizuMZ-M571CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.262 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:21 | by ThaDafinser