User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; meanpathbot/1.0; +http://www.meanpath.com/meanpathbot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesmeanpathbotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesmeanpathbotBot/Crawler0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesmeanpathbot/1.0close0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesMeanpath BotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesmeanpathbotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MeanPath Bot 1.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:21 | by ThaDafinser