User agent detail

HTC-TITAN X310e/UCWEB2.1.0.155/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTITAN X310e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-TITAN closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.1 HTCTITANsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.1.0close HTCTITAN X310ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.1.0.155close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.1.0.155 HTC TITANcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.1Gecko HTCTITAN X310emobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:21 | by ThaDafinser