User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFOT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.11 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Silk 3.11Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.11WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.11Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.11closeAndroid AmazonKindle Firecloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.11WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire (2nd Gen)closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.11Webkit 535.19FireOS 2AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKFOTTabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:21 | by ThaDafinser