User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) WhiteHat Aviator/37.0.2062.99 Chrome/37.0.2062.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
WhiteHat Aviator 37.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WhiteHat Aviator 37.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.23502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.99WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aviator 37Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.99closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.088 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:21 | by ThaDafinser