User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFTT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.11 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-077.php
Silk 3.11Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.11WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.11Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.11closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.11WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.11Webkit 535.19FireOS 2AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKFTTTabletyesyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:20 | by ThaDafinser