User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia5220/07.23; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.5.0.34.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5220 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 1.5Gecko SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.5Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia5220smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 07.23;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.5.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia5220closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.5.0.34.16Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5220closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.5.0Gecko Series40 Nokia5220 XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.5closeNokia Series 40 Nokia5220Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:19 | by ThaDafinser