User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.1; zh-cn; Dell_Streak_10_Pro Build/HMJ37; 1280*800) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DellStreak_10_Pro Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.144 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 3.1GenericAndroid 3.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.1DellStreak 10 Prosmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.1closeAndroid 3.1DellStreak_10_Procloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56106 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 3.1DellStreak 10 Protabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.1closeAndroid 3.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:19 | by ThaDafinser