User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android 4.1.2; Linux; Opera Mobi/ADR-1301080958) Presto/2.11.355 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
Opera Mobile 12.10Android 4.12.10 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.10Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.10closeAndroid 4.1.2OperaMobi for Androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto Android 4.1yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 12.10closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.11.355Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.11.355Android 4.1.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 12closeAndroid 4.1OperaMobi for AndroidSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:19 | by ThaDafinser