User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; ONE_TOUCH_4033E) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.460 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
UC Browser 9.4.0.460Android 4.2.2 AlcatelOne Touch 4033Esmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close iBall7236 3G17mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Android 4.2AlcatelOne Touch 4033Esmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.0.460 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Android 4.2.2AlcatelOne Touch Pop C3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.073 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:19 | by ThaDafinser