User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ARCHOS FAMILYPAD 2 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.66961
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ArchosFAMILYPAD 2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.1ArchosFAMILYPAD 2tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.1.1ArchosFAMILYPAD 2closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.66961WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.1.1ArchosFamilypad 2tabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.131 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:18 | by ThaDafinser