User agent detail

Mobile BrowserPolarisSamsung-SPHM320 Infraware-Polaris/5.01 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSPHM320 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 5.01closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 5.1close SamsungSPHM320closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 5.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 5.01 SamsungSPHM320 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:18 | by ThaDafinser