User agent detail

Mozilla/4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Netscape 4.79Win2000 5.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.79Gecko Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.7.9closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 2000desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.79closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.79 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.7.9 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:17 | by ThaDafinser