User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Iceweasel 31.2Linux unknown31.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 31.2Gecko 31.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 31.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 31.2.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 31.2Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 31.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 31.2.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 31.2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 31.2.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 31.2.0Gecko 31.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 31.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 31.9closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:16 | by ThaDafinser