User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.29 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1396.70617
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 20.0Linux Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 20.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1396.70617closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 20.0.1396.70617closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1396.70617closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1396closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.29closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1396.70617WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1396.70617closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:16 | by ThaDafinser