User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.0.4; ru; IQ440) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.1.359 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 8.8Android 4.0unknown FlyEnergieMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.0FlyEnergieMobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close iBall3G 7271-HD70mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.0yes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.1closeAndroid 4.0.4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.1.359 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.0.4FlyIQ440 Energiemobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:15 | by ThaDafinser