User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-cn; NOMI_L008 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.2 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
QQ Browser 5.2Android 4.4.2WebKit NomiL008smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.2WebKit Android 4.4NomiL008smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.2closeAndroid 4.4.2NOMI_L008closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.2WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.2Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.2NOMI_L008mobile:smartyescloseclose0.106 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:15 | by ThaDafinser