User agent detail

Mercury/894 CFNetwork/672.0.2 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Mercury 0.0iOS 7.0unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mercury WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Mercury 894closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mercury Browser 8.9.4closeiOS 7.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.45304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mercury 894 iOS 7.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.2closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mercury Browser 894 Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mercury Browser 8.9.4 iOS 7.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:15 | by ThaDafinser