User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-; 68145 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.24 T5/2.0 bdbrowser_i18n/4.5.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Baidu Browser 4.5Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Baidu Browser 4.5T5 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.268145closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.24Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.54706 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 4.5.0.4Webkit 534.24Android 4.2.268145mobile:smartyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:14 | by ThaDafinser