User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-US; BQ 7056G Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.0.2.523 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
UC Browser 10.0Android 4.4unknown BQ7056GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.0U3 Android 4.4BQ7056GTabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.0WebKit Android 4.4bq7056Gtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.0.2closeAndroid 4.4.2BQ 7056Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.0.2.523WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.2BQ 7056Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.077 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.072 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:14 | by ThaDafinser