User agent detail

Nokia2680s-2/1.0 (04.56) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Nokia2680 slidemobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia2680s-2 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia2680 slidemobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia2680s-2smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia2680s-2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2680s-2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia2680 slidemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia2680Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:14 | by ThaDafinser