User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; iris450 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 450 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2LavaIris 450smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 450closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 450closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2LavaIris 450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.2LavaIris 450Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:14 | by ThaDafinser