User agent detail

compatible; Netseer crawler/2.0; +http://www.netseer.com/crawler.html; crawler@netseer.com
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Netseer crawler 2.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
compatible closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.206 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNetseer crawlerclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesNetSeer CrawlerCrawler0.082 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetSeer Crawler 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:13 | by ThaDafinser