User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-657.php
Thunderbird 31.7Win7 6.131.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 31.7Gecko 31.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 31.7.0closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 31.7 Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Thunderbird 31.7.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 31.7.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 31.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 31.7.0Gecko 31.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:13 | by ThaDafinser