User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.3; LG-P880 Build/KTU84M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 [FB_IAB/FB4A;FBAV/28.0.0.20.16;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Facebook App 0.0Android 4.4unknown LGOptimus 4X HDMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App Blink Android 4.4LGOptimus 4X HDMobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.3LGP880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 28.0 Android 4.4LGP880smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 28.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.3LGP880closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.3LGLGP880closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook Blink Android 4.4.3LGOptimus 4X HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 33closeAndroid 4.4LGP880Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:13 | by ThaDafinser