User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.0.3; ru; Lenovo_A390t) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.482 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.4Android 4.0unknown LenovoA390tMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 Android 4.0LenovoA390tMobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxA075mobile-browseryescloseclose0.275 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Android 4.0LenovoA390tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA390tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.482 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Android 4.0.3LenovoA390mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:13 | by ThaDafinser