User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/12.04 Chromium/20.0.1132.47 Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
Chromium 20.0Ubuntu 12.04unknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 20.0WebKit Ubuntu 12.04Linux DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.47closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 20.0.1132.47closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 20.0WebKit Ubuntu 12.04desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.47closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 20.0.1132closeUbuntu 12.4closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 20.0.1132.47closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 20.0.1132.47WebKit 536.11Linux 12.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 20.0.1132.47Webkit 536.11Ubuntu 12.04desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.47closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 20.0.1132.47closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:12 | by ThaDafinser