User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Samsung/I8510M Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configurat
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI8510M Profile Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.2SamsungI8510M Profilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2 Symbian OS Series 60 3.2NokiaConfiguratfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungI8510M Profilecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.2SamsungI8510M Profilemobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3SamsungGT-I8510Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:12 | by ThaDafinser