User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 95) VoilaBot BETA 1.2 (http://www.voila.com/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
VoilaBot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.0Trident Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesVoilaBot BETA 1.2close0.214 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesOrange BotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesVoilaBotclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesVoilaBotCrawler0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
VoilaBot Crawler Beta 1.2 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesVoilabotclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:12 | by ThaDafinser