User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I8350/UCWEB2.0.0.149/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-I8350 UCWEB2.0.0.149closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.0 SamsungGT-I8350smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.0close SamsungGT-I8350closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0.0.149close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.0.0.149 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.0Gecko SamsungGT-I8350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:12 | by ThaDafinser