User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv7l; en-GB; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090514 Firefox/3.0 Tablet browser 0.9.7 RX-34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
MicroB 0.9.7GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox Gecko Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
MicroB 0.9.7closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 0.9Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
MicroB 0.9.7closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0Gecko 20090514Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.2a1Linux desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MozillaTabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:11 | by ThaDafinser