User agent detail

Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; lt; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009082707 Firefox/3.0.14 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.14closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.14closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.14closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.14close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.14Gecko 2009082707Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.14Gecko 1.9.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.14closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:10 | by ThaDafinser