User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Windows; U; wds 7.10; en-US; DELL; Venue Pro) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.0.0.285 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows Phone 7.10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.0U2 WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows NokiaLumia 510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.0 Windows DellVenue Protabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.0.0closeWindows Phone 7.10closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.0.0.285 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.399 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.0Gecko Windows Phone 7.5DellVenue Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:10 | by ThaDafinser